No, not Peter Jackson; though I’m sure I’ll be thanking him plenty after I drag my family to see DOS this weekend.
The Peter I’m thanking is the poet, Peter McWilliams, for affording me the somewhat plausible excuse to post more Richard Armitage pics!
I need some substance around here!
While searching for something to lift my sour mood, I stumbled upon Peter’s book of cute little love poems; they made me smile, and they just seemed to fit (I was going to post a Speedo pic here in relation to the word “fit” but I just couldn’t bring myself to do it)
So without further ado, I give you cheesy cliches and Richard:
“You are the nicest thing I could ever do for myself.”
“I cannot keep my smiles in single file.”
“Love, no matter what you feel it for, is still love. The object does not change the emotion. But the emotion quite often changes the object.”
“I look at you and I see all the beauty inside of me.”
“You make flowers of my hours. today was a bouquet.”
“Sometimes it all seems to fit. In those moments I appreciate you most of all. As I need you less I love you more.”
and now one of my own masterpieces:
*clears throat*
“Roses are red and Violets are blue,
or purple, or pink, I think some are even white…
Sugar is sweet (unless you use an artificial sweetener,
which could possibly lead to your death) and so are you!
I think. because I don’t actually know you. but whatever.”
tangents are so frustrating!
Nowhere in Particular RA 
Haha! I needed to laugh and you came to the rescue. Yes, our lovely man inspires many thoughts, poems, songs, etc…Maybe one day I’ll share one of mine! 😉
LikeLike
I can write actual poems, but it’s far safer to make up silly ones! I’m glad I could make you laugh though; I needed it too 😉
LikeLike
He really is adorkable and inspirational; much more than just a gorgeous man. I love his smile, especially when it reaches his eyes!
LikeLike
You are reliably goofy, Ms. Kelbel!! BIG SMILE. Love is love, no matter the object. Well said. Looking forward to seeing more of the object/subject of my love in the next few days. Can’t wait to see the film, but have to wait until Friday. Still, YAY!! 😀
LikeLike
I have to wait until Sunday 😡 stupid family and their stupid commitments (I may see it again next week after I see it w/the fam first, shh! don’t tell)
LikeLike
I am sure I will see it again as soon as may be. I only saw AUJ twice in the theater – really sad for my usual numbers….We’ll see if I can get the numbers up for DOS!! 😀
LikeLike
I don’t usually see movies more than once in the theater. I saw “The Dark Knight” 3x tho 😎
LikeLike
Oh, I’m not ashamed to say I’ve seen some movies many more than 3x!! AND I saw The Boy from Oz with Hugh Jackman on Broadway, in the theater, not a movie, i.e. very expensive, FIFTEEN TIMES!!!! Yes, I did. And believe me, that was nothing like the maximum for others…..
LikeLike
LOL! Great poem ! Yes , he is even better than sugar,Kelbel 😀
LikeLike
I reaaallly love sugar! so if he’s *better* than sugar, I.am.in.trouble.
LikeLike
I love your poem!
It’s really cool.
I think that it’s
Better than gruel.
If you should write
Another of those,
Make sure you put in
Richard A’s nose.
THE END.
LikeLike
look at you, all rhyme-y and show off-y 😀
and what is gruel exactly? I’ve always wondered; is it porridge? is it stew?…is it tasty, is it scrumptious 😛
tangent again, Ugh!
LikeLike
Isss it tasssstyy? Issss it… scrumptiooussss?
lol No, it is not. Gruel is like porridge, but if porridge were less fun. And slimy. I’ve never had to eat it, thank God. :}
LikeLike